Wednesday, January 29, 2020

That Time Of The Year Essay Example for Free

That Time Of The Year Essay The Turning point: the poem is addressed to Mr. W. H. and it is   a Shakesperean   sonnet. A sonnet is a lyric poem of 14 lines with a   formal rhyme scheme, expressing different aspects of a simple thought, mood or feeling, resolved or summed up in the last lines of the poem. The English sonnet is divided into three quartrain, each rhymed differently with a final independently rhymed couplet that makes an effective unifying climax to the wholea b a b, c d c d, e f e f, gg .   True to the Shakesperean tradition this sonnet too has three quartrains . The first one portrays   late autumn or early winter. It portrays a   dull, cheerless and gloomy landscape- leafless and bare trees, withered and yellowed leaves, branches of trees deprived of   all the usual music since the chorus of birds has   flown away. The poet compares himself with this cheerless landscape and seems to lament the departed glory and happiness of his   life. Similarly, in the second stanza the poet equates himself to a twilight which in its wake will bring about a dark, silent and long night full of deathlike chill. The third quartrain portrays another gloomy scene—afire getting choked to death under the wait of its own ashes Three quartrains and each one of them, sad gloomy and pessimistic. In which we discover the poet wallowing in self –pity, indulging in vain regrets..:- But the last couplet of the poem ushers in cheer, mirth, joy and happiness. into the scene.and that is the change our discussion is all about.The poet’s mood is totally transformed. Despair and despondency give way to a vibrant otimism. He feels convinced that his failing health and decadent body could not remain unnoticed by his loved one. When he comes to know that the moment of final goodbye was fast approaching, he would keep everything and everybody aside and cocentrate on him and him only. It would be a blessing in disguise and make the ties of his love even stronger.

Tuesday, January 21, 2020

Wedding Speech for a Maid of Honor or Best Woman :: Wedding Toasts Roasts Speeches

Wedding Speech for a Maid of Honor or Best Woman My role of today is that of a Maid of Honor, and my name is Popen. Alison and I have known each other since tenth grade, eight years, which quite frankly, seems just like yesterday on one hand†¦and like a million years ago on the other! Have you ever really thought about what friendship truly means to you? Well, I have especially when it comes to Alison and I. My friendship with her has been special to me, because she was a great person to go through the trauma of our teenage years with! No matter how much we have been through, we have always been there for each other through thick and thin. We support each other and stick up for one another when the other needs us most. We have gotten a lot closer over the years. We have seen other through the good, the bad and the ugly. I have loved watching this romance bloom. Nanen is a great guy! He’s funny, friendly, really easy to get along with and really talkative especially once you get him going. Alison has just blossomed since Nanen came into her life. When Alison met Nanen it was obvious from the very beginning that he was the one. There was something different about him. She seemed to sparkle more than ever before. She’s become happier and has a better outlook on life in general. I look so forward to the future for these two. I know that Alison and Nanen will last a lifetime with each other. They just seem to have that certain something about them, and I know that theirs will truly be – a match made in heaven.

Monday, January 13, 2020

How democratic is the UK Essay

It can be argued that Britain is both democratic and undemocratic; this can be shown via a range of issues relating to British politics and the society in which we live. The generally accepted definition of a democracy is a form of government in which the major decisions of government and the direction of policy behind these decisions – rests directly or indirectly on the freely given consent of the freely given consent of the freely majority of the adults government. There are two forms of democracy but the UK is run through an indirect or representative democracy as opposed to a direct democracy, which relies on referendums and would be difficult in a large, modern society. Furthermore, the UK is a parliamentary democracy, the government and representatives are intermingled meaning that the UK does not have separation of powers, meaning that the executive, legislative and judicial courts all work together unlike the American Presidential system which could create a lack in communication. In this essay, I propose to argue both for and against and eventually come to a conclusion whether the UK is democratic or not and give a comparison between the UK and the US in terms of democracy. There is no such thing as a ‘perfect’ democracy but certain aspects are needed to make a democracy. A democracy needs a political system for choosing and replacing the government through frequent, free and fair elections in which people choose their leaders and to hold their leaders accountable for their policies and their conduct in office. Elections have to occur at regular intervals, as prescribed by law. Those in power cannot extend their terms in office without asking for the consent of the people again in an election. For elections to be free and fair, they have to be administered by a neutral, fair, and professional body that treats all political parties and candidates equally. All parties and candidates must have the right to campaign freely, to present their proposals to the voters both directly and through the mass media. A democracy also needs the active participation of the people, as citizens, in politics and civic life. To vote wisely, each citizen should listen to the views of the different parties and candidates, and then make his or her own decision on whom to support. Furthermore there should be protection of human rights of all citizens and a rule of law, in which the laws and procedures apply equally to all citizens. Does the UK fulfill these four key elements? Yes, the UK does. Therefore we can say the UK governmental system. Democracy by definition means the government by the people. That means that all the people should be able to have their say in one way or another in everything that affects their lives. As said previously, the UK is run through a representative democracy but there are problems with a representative democracy. Representative democracy would be fine if the representatives would really make all their decisions only after consulting their constituencies. In the least, after having a clear idea about the views of their constituents on a particular issue, and trying to accommodate these views as best as possible. However, a vast majority of countries that call themselves Representative Democracies are not true democracies according to the above definition. Most of them are actually just Elected Dictatorships. People can vote usually only once every four or five years. They do not vote on any issues. They just elect their so called representatives who then until the next elections have no obligations by law and little incentives to base their decisions on individual issues on the wishes on their electorate. They hardly ever bother to consult them on their stands on various issues. Therefore, legislative bodies composed of such â€Å"representatives† can effectively act in a very dictatorial manner between the elections. So to meet the definition of democracy, a direct democracy must be in place, like in Switzerland. The UK is divided up into constituencies. Within these constituencies, are MPs for each political party. The first past the post system means that the MP with most votes (first past the post) will win power for their party in that constituency. In the UK voting system, we do not vote who is our next Prime Minister. Our vote goes towards the MPs for our constituency. In this sense, the idea of UK as a representative democracy is flawed as we as people are not voting for one single figure but for an MP. The reason for voting for that party may be influenced by the leader of that party but you are not voting specifically for that person. An element of Britain’s governmental system is that there is no written constitution. This means that, theoretically, the government is free to pass any legislation as long as they have the majority in parliament which could be easily achieved if the party has a large majority of seats. This means there is no safeguard for laws that can be altered or new ones that could be created. This is very undemocratic as the government therefore has too much power. The government is also in possession of other powers such as the royal prerogative that allows the prime minister to go to war without consent from parliament. An example of where this was used was the Iraq war in 2005, which was heavily resented by a large majority of the public. Even though this aspect of Britain’s governmental system is undemocratic, parliament generally prevents government from taking to much power.

Saturday, January 4, 2020

Leading Causes of Diabetis Essay - 1174 Words

Type II diabetes is a serious problem that has been increasing over the years. The CDC predicts that by the year 2050 one in every three US adults could have diabetes. Type II diabetes, happens when the body gradually loses its ability to use or produce insulin, this is the leading cause of cases of diabetes. A person with diabetes has a lot of risk factors that come with this disease. Patients with diabetes have a two to four time greater chance of having a stroke and also having a heart disease related death. Diabetes is the leading cause of new blindness and non traumatic amputations. Insulin is a hormone in the body that is critical in many of the body’s functions. Insulin is a hormone made up of a small polypeptide protein that is†¦show more content†¦At the same time insulin levels are lowered so the risk of hypoglycemia or low blood sugar is minimized. With exercise muscle can get glucose from the blood with out insulin because muscle contractions directly stim ulate GLUT-4 in the cells to move glucose from the bloodstream into the cell. A single bout of moderate intensity exercise can increase glucose uptake by at least 40%. The benefits of glucose uptake with exercise last up to 48 to 72 h after the last exercise session. With diabetes and insulin sensitivity problems being an up and coming problem especially with the adolescent population that is where I will look closest at the research with aerobic exercise and insulin sensitivity. In a study focusing in on Hispanic sedentary adolescents 29 subject participated in a 12 week long exercise program and prior to the program all the subject did not partake in a normal exercise program less than 45 minutes per week of activity. Participants came to the physical therapy unit at Texas Children’s Hospital twice a week for a 30-min aerobic exercise session on a treadmill, elliptical or a bicycle based off of the subjects preference each session started and ended with a ten minute warm up and cool down. The 30 minute bout of exercise was performed at 70 percent of the patients VO2max. The patients also performed two exercise bouts at home twice a week. The present study demonstrates that a 12-week aerobic exercise program (four times 30 min per week)